Google may give us information on more than just flu outbreaks and diet trends -- a new study shows it also demonstrates how our interest in certain mental disorders differs by season.


The study, which was led by John W. Ayers from the Graduate School of Public Health at San Diego State University, shows that Google searches about mental disorders followed seasonal patterns. According to this research, mental disorders could be more correlated with the seasons than initially believed.


The findings were published in the American Journal of Preventative Medicine. With the help of Google’s public database of queries, the scientists assessed mental health searches in the United States and Australia from 2006 to 2010. Then the researchers grouped the mental conditions, which included attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, anxiety, bipolar disorder, depression, eating disorders like anorexia or bulimia, obsessive-compulsive disorder, schizophrenia and suicidal ideation.


Using mathematical methods to analyze trends, the researchers found that in both the U.S. and Australia, all mental health searches were less frequent in the summer than in the winter. In fact, the pattern seemed to reflect the length of sunlight according to the season.


Searches in the United States on eating disorders were 37 percent lower in the summers in comparison with the winters, while they were 42 percent lower during the summers in Australia. Searches on bipolar disorder were 16 percent lower during American summers and 17 percent lower during Australia ones.


The scientists found search declines during the summers on schizophrenia, ADHD, anxiety and OCD, activity that appeared in both the U.S and Australia. Searches on suicide also declined by 24 and 29 percent in the respective countries.


The findings are interesting because while certain mental conditions -- like seasonal affective disorder -- are known to follow the seasons, it wasn't really known that there could be a seasonal link with other mental conditions, too, researchers noted.


Studying mental illness typically presents a challenge since participants are often reluctant to provide honest answers about mental health, but researchers noted that the Internet offers a great tool that provides anonymity so that researchers can better analyze pervasiveness of mental conditions in the U.S.


Also on HuffPost:






  • How Much We Know And Care About CPR, AEDs And Cardiac Arrest


    In two new studies, researchers from the University of Pennsylvania have found that people are tweeting about cardiac arrest, CPR and AEDS (automated external defibrillators), and that the microblogging platform has the potential to spread more awareness and spur more discussion on the topics. The research was presented this month at the annual <a href="http://scientificsessions.org/" target="_hplink">Scientific Sessions</a> meeting of the American Heart Association.

    In one of the studies, researchers sought to find out what exactly <a href="http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/meeting_abstract/124/21_MeetingAbstracts/A53?sid=6e736fad-18a8-4580-8b6d-225308e637e6" target="_hplink">people were asking about cardiac arrest and CPR </a>on Twitter. They analyzed 13,981 tweets and found that 21 percent of cardiac arrest-related questions had to do with symptoms, prognosis or risk factors of the condition, and 39 percent of the questions had to do with guidelines, certification and proper technique of CPR. Forty percent of the questions had to do with costs, safety and use of AEDs.

    In the other study, researchers looked at 15,324 tweets that contained some sort of <a href="http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/meeting_abstract/124/21_MeetingAbstracts/A52?sid=6e736fad-18a8-4580-8b6d-225308e637e6" target="_hplink">information about cardiac arrest</a>. Among their findings: 14 percent of those tweets were a direct reference to a cardiac arrest, while 5 percent were personal stories of cardiac arrest.

    Twenty-nine percent of the tweets had to do with using CPR or an AED and almost 60 percent of the tweets had to do with training or advocacy events for cardiac arrest, or news about a celebrity, athlete or young adult who had undergone cardiac arrest.




  • What We Think About The Flu


    A study published earlier this year in the journal <em>PLoS Computational Biology</em> shows that Twitter could be used to track <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/15/twitter-flu-shot-vaccinations_n_1010899.html" target="_hplink">flu shot vaccination rates</a> and attitudes.

    That research, conducted by Pennsylvania State researchers, involved analysis of 477,768 tweets between August 2009 and January 2010 that contained some sort of wordage about the H1N1 vaccine. The researcher was able to see what parts of the U.S. had the highest flu vaccination rates (based on the Twitter information), as well as what the general sentiments were toward the vaccine (New Englanders are most positive toward the vaccine, and are also the most likely to get vaccinated).

    Researchers also found that people were most negative toward the flu vaccine when it was first introduced, but then the reaction grew increasingly positive the more time passed.




  • What's Ailing Us -- And What We've Got Wrong About Our Health


    Recent research from Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore shows that you can look on Twitter to get a <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/08/twitter-health_n_893466.html#s305983&title=Chris_Tung" target="_hplink">general feel for what ills people are experiencing</a>. They found in their study of 1.5 million health-related tweets that people are tweeting most about depression, cancer, obesity, allergies, insomnia and pain.

    Researchers also found that Twitter could be used to unearth some common health misconceptions we have.

    For example, "we found that some people tweeted that they were <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-14059745" target="_hplink">taking antibiotics for the flu</a>," Ph.D. student Michael J. Paul, one of the researchers for the project, told BBC News. "But antibiotics don't work on the flu, which is a virus, and this practice could contribute to the growing antibiotic resistance problems."




  • How We're Feeling


    Turns out, we're <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/29/twitter-mood-study_n_987569.html" target="_hplink">happiest early in the morning</a> and around midnight, according to a Twitter study conducted by Cornell University researchers.

    Researchers looked at half a billion tweets from more than 2 million Twitter users over a two-year period, and found that Twitter users' <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/29/twitter-mood-study_n_987569.html" target="_hplink">moods tend to start happy</a> early in the day and then get more negative as the day wears on, but then peak again in happiness at midnight.

    "Everybody we told about this has had the same reaction: 'That's obvious. People go to work, they get stressed -- of course their mood deteriorates,'" study researcher Michael Macy, Ph.D., a professor of sociology at Cornell, told HuffPost. "It turns out, that's not true."

    Because researchers found that the "daily mood swing" unearthed by Twitter was also the case during the weekends, they suggest that the changes in emotions might be affected by our sleep and circadian rhythms, and not just a bad mood brought on by the workday.




  • What We Understand (And Misunderstand) About Antibiotics


    What we <a href="http://www.ajicjournal.org/article/S0196-6553(10)00034-9/abstract" target="_hplink">think we know about antibiotics</a> is very easily spread through Twitter, according to a study published last year in <em>AJIC: American Journal of Infection Control</em>. However, the viral nature of Twitter has the ability to backfire if the antibiotic information isn't correct, researchers said.

    The study, conducted by Columbia University and MixedInk researchers, looked at 52,153 <a href="http://www.ajicjournal.org/article/S0196-6553(10)00034-9/abstract" target="_hplink">tweets that mentioned antibiotics</a> that were posted between March 13, 2009 and July 31, 2009. Researchers used word combinations like "extra + antibiotic(s)" and "leftover + antibiotic(s)" to narrow down the tweets further.

    They found that when it came to tweeting about antibiotics, people were most commonly talking about how many days they had left on an antibiotic regimen, or a desire that antibiotics help to kick an illness soon. The second most common topic was advice on antibiotics, and the third most common topic was side effects that come from taking antibiotics.

    Out of all the tweets, 700 were spreading some sort of misunderstanding about antibiotics, researchers found. For example: the word combination of "flu + antibiotic(s)" yielded 345 tweets, which in turn reached a total of 172,571 Twitter followers.




  • Related Video


    New Study Reveals Twitter Knows Your Mood