Basic insurance coverage for abortions could soon be banned in Michigan, even without support from Republican Governor Rick Snyder.


A petition seeking to enact a law that would restrict abortion coverage was certified Monday. Spearheaded by the No Taxes For Abortion Insurance committee of Right to Life of Michigan, they received over 315,000 signatures from Michigan voters, with nearly 300,000 certified by the Michigan Board of State Canvassers. They needed 258,000.


If passed, the Abortion Insurance Opt-Out Act will require women to purchase separate riders to cover elective abortion, and abortions could not be covered under basic health care plans. Employers will be compelled to notify employees if they have purchase a rider.


In the bill language, abortions deemed necessary to avert the death of the woman and treatment for women who experience miscarriages and ectopic pregnancies are not considered "elective," and so could still be covered under basic insurance. There is no exception for rape or incest.


The Right to Life of Michigan group has in part posed the issue as a question of choice over how residents' money is spent.


“Michigan citizens do not want to pay for someone else’s abortion with their tax dollars or health insurance premiums," Right to Life of Michigan President Barbara Listing said in a statement Monday. "Abortion is not health care; abortion kills a living, developing human being.”


By law, federal and state funding can only be used for abortions in cases of life endangerment, rape or incest.


Critics of the legislation say it may cause problems for doctors and hospitals as well as women who may wish to have abortions, particularly those who are victims of a crime. You wouldn't be able to buy a rider after becoming pregnant to have an abortion covered, Meghan Groen, director of government relations for Planned Parenthood Advocates of Michigan, pointed out to RH Reality Check, a news site about sexual and reproductive health and justice issues.



“It’s not like, oh, I was raped and so now I’ll buy this rider," Groen said. "Nobody is anticipating being a victim of crime.”


Under a quirk of Michigan law, the petition allows for the act to be passed by a simple majority vote of the legislature without Snyder needing to sign. The law would also be referendum-proof.


"It’s unconscionable that Right to Life has launched a campaign against women’s rights by finding a loophole in the law and skirting a signature from the governor,” said Jessica Tramontana, communications director for liberal advocacy group Progress Michigan, in an October statement. “The president of Right to Life went as far as describing this extra insurance like buying coverage for a 'flood or a car accident.' Rape is not an accident."


If it does not pass, the measure will go to voters to decide and will appear on a statewide ballot next year. If so, the legislation could be nixed: In an August poll, public relations firm Lambert, Edwards & Associates found 50 percent of likely voters disapproved of the measure, while 42 percent approved, with a sampling error of plus or minus four percent. Six hundred voters were surveyed statewide.


But a majority of members of both the state House and Senate already signed the petition, according to the Detroit Free Press, and similar legislation was approved by legislators last year. It was vetoed by Snyder at the same time that he passed other legislation enforcing new regulations for abortion clinics and doctors.


"It just went too far," Snyder said last December about the bill he vetoed.


Eight states have laws that restrict private insurance coverage of abortion, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a research organization that advances sexual and reproductive health and rights.


The state House and Senate have 40 business days while in session to act on the measure. The legislature goes on winter recess on Dec. 12.



Also on HuffPost:




Loading Slideshow...



  • Sharia


    A week before North Carolina Republicans turned to motorcycle safety, they attached proposed anti-abortion measures to <a href="http://www.ncleg.net/Applications/BillLookUp/LoadBillDocument.aspx?SessionCode=2013&DocNum=6635&SeqNum=0" target="_blank">a bill that would also have guarded the state</a> from "foreign law." The bill read much like a number of other anti-Sharia proposals that have popped up around the nation, except this one contained a <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/02/north-carolina-abortion-bill_n_3537238.html" target="_blank">host of restrictions</a> on abortion coverage and providers.




  • Motorcycles


    When their abortion-Sharia combination effort failed, North Carolina Republicans concocted a new plan: Tack the anti-abortion measure onto something perhaps even less related. That <a href="http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/Sessions/2013/Bills/Senate/PDF/S353v3.pdf" target="_blank">bill was initially meant</a> to increase penalties on drivers that threatened motorcyclists with their actions on the road. As of this week, it would also impose strict standards on abortion clinics and prohibit sex-selective abortions.




  • Flood Insurance


    Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) injected abortion politics into an otherwise uncontroversial flood insurance bill in 2012. The legislation, initially meant to boost the National Flood Insurance Program on the cusp of hurricane season, was expected to pass, until Paul slid in a measure claiming that life begins at fertilization. Paul claimed he was justified in adding the amendment because Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) wouldn't allow a freestanding vote on fetal personhood. His measure <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/26/rand-paul-fetal-personhood-flood-insurance_n_1628128.html" target="_blank">eventually succeeded</a> in stalling the legislation.




  • Cybersecurity


    Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/healthwatch/abortion/241421-sen-lee-files-abortion-amendment-to-cybersecurity-bill" target="_blank">filed an amendment to a 2012 cybersecurity bill</a> that would have imposed a 20-week abortion ban in Washington, D.C. The cybersecurity bill <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/2chambers/post/cybersecurity-bill-fails-in-the-senate/2012/08/02/gJQABofxRX_blog.html" target="_blank">ultimately failed</a>, in part because senators <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/241851-cybersecurity-act-fails-to-advance-in-senate" target="_blank">couldn't reach a deal</a> on a host of amendments that had been appended to the bill.




  • Homeland Security


    Even a Homeland Security appropriations bill couldn't escape the reach of anti-abortion Republicans earlier this year. Attached to the GOP-controlled House's $46 billion spending bill was <a href="http://carter.house.gov/press-releases/chairman-carter-introduces-prolife-amendment-to-department-of-homeland-security-appropriations-bill/" target="_blank">Rep. John Carter's (R-Texas) measure</a> to block ICE from using agency funding to provide abortion services for detainees except in the case of rape, incest or if the life of the mother would be endangered. According to Barbara Gonzalez, an ICE spokeswoman, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/07/homeland-security-bill-passes-house_n_1579710.html" target="_blank">that was already department policy</a>, and Homeland Security had not paid for abortion services since its 2003 creation.




  • Transportation


    A very passable transportation bill was thrown a curveball in 2012 when Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) submitted an amendment that would have overridden the Obama administration's new contraception coverage rule and allowed any employer to refuse to cover any kind of health care service by citing "moral reasons." The Senate <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/01/blunt-amendment-vote-fails-senate-contraception_n_1313287.html" target="_blank">eventually rejected the proposal</a>, and after months of wrangling, the bill was passed by <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/2chambers/post/congress-passes-two-year-transportation-bill/2012/06/29/gJQApmDtBW_blog.html" target="_blank">both the House and Senate</a>.




  • Agricultural Subsidies


    In 2011, then-Sen. Jim Demint (R-S.C.) took aim at Planned Parenthood with an amendment to an appropriations bill dealing with agricultural subsidies. His bill <a href="http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/10/19/sen-demint-takes-aim-at-planned-parenthood-robo-abortions/" target="_blank">would have ensured</a> that federal funding toward telemedicine services couldn't have been used by the women's health services provider. Planned Parenthood has tested a system that allows women seeking abortions to connect remotely with a qualified physician to discuss using mifepristone, or RU-486. Trials done in Iowa months before DeMint's amendment showed that <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Health/iowa-study-shows-telemedicine-abortion-safe-women-access/story?id=14166312#.Ud8L4j46VH0" target="_blank">the practice was safe</a>.




  • Business Tax Credits


    In 2012, Republicans in the New Hampshire state House tried to <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/15/new-hampshire-abortion-waiting-period_n_1519347.html" target="_blank">sneak an anti-abortion provision</a> into an unrelated bill regarding tax credits for businesses. Earlier in the year, lawmakers had voted down a GOP attempt to pass the abortion restrictions by themselves. The state Senate <a href="http://www.addictinginfo.org/2012/05/25/new-hampshire-senate-kills-anti-abortion-measure-added-to-unrelated-bill/" target="_blank">ultimately shot down</a> the second attempt as well.