For four years, it has been common practice at one Texas day care to swaddle infants, burrito-style, for nap time. But in December, child-care providers there were told there were new licensing standards and that they needed to stop wrapping babies altogether.


Overnight, the atmosphere in the classrooms changed.


"Young babies that were sleeping an hour [or] an hour and a half are now sleeping 20 minutes," "J.," an employee who asked that only her first initial be used to protect her job, told The Huffington Post. "I have some babies who are not sleeping at all."


And the teachers are at a loss.


"They feel that they are not able to meet the needs of the infants they are caring for," said J. "They are not allowed to do what they feel is needed."


Day cares around the country have been quietly moving away from swaddling since 2011, when the National Resource Center on Child Health and Safety, in conjunction with the American Academy of Pediatrics and American Public Health Association, released its third edition of "Caring for Our Children," a set of safety guidelines for early care and education programs. According to those rules, swaddling can increase the odds of serious health outcomes, particularly if a baby is placed on his or her stomach to sleep, and can also increase the risk of hip problems. "In child care settings," the standard says, "swaddling is not necessary or recommended."


As more child-care providers are affected by these conclusions, experts and pediatricians are speaking out. Dr. Harvey Karp, creator of "The Happiest Baby on the Block" books and DVDs, and often credited with making the ancient practice of swaddling vogue again, has vented his frustration on CNN and in Parents magazine. (He also is a frequent contributor to The Huffington Post.)


"They're changing something that is a very entrenched standard of care of the community," Karp told HuffPost. "The burden of proof on their shoulders to change something that is such a well-used -- universally-used -- intervention is rather high."


The NRC statement lists only five studies as references to justify its conclusion, Karp said, while simultaneously ignoring a robust body of literature showing swaddling benefits, including reducing crying in newborns.


"We started swaddling after I saw Dr. Karp present at a conference, and it made such a huge difference," J. said. "The babies fell asleep so quickly. It changed how much they slept, and how much better they slept."


In 2011, the American Academy of Pediatrics issued its latest recommendation for what constitutes a safe sleeping environment for babies. The organization agreed that when done correctly, swaddling is an effective technique to help calm infants and promote sleep. However, the report -- which focused on strategies for reducing Sudden Infant Death Syndrome -- ultimately concluded there was not enough evidence showing it helps babies in that regard.


"Swaddling is an effective way to calm infants, especially in the newborn period, and is generally used in the first three months of life," a spokesperson for the American Academy of Pediatrics wrote in an e-mail to The Huffington Post, cautioning, however, that in a child-care setting, multiple people care for an infant and not all of them may be sufficiently trained in proper swaddling.


There is a wrong way to swaddle. If a baby is wrapped too tightly in the wrong

position -- with his or her legs straight or pressed together -- it can cause hip dysplasia or dislocation.


"If the infant kicks the blankets off, or the swaddling blankets are not applied correctly, loose bedcovers would be in the crib, which is against AAP policy," the spokesperson wrote. "The AAP understands why NRC has implemented this

standard."


The American Academy of Pediatrics may understand it, but many parents and day-care workers do not.


"You get these little babies in day care who can't sleep and are extremely fussy," said Rachel Turow, a 33-year-old attorney whose 8-month-old goes to a day care in Washington, D.C., where swaddling recently was banned. "It's really bad for the baby, it's really bad for the teachers, and therefore, it's really bad for all of the kids."


Her son has not been swaddled for some time because of his age, but she nonetheless worries that his teachers will now have to spend an "inordinate" amount of time soothing the youngest babies, hurting her son's experience.


"Our teachers are very committed to what they do, and they're feeling very frustrated that they can't do what they know helps the baby," echoed J. "There's more crying. The babies are not as happy or content when they're awake. It makes

everything a lot more stressful."


Related on HuffPost:






  • Their Baby Cuteness Doesn't Predict Adult Attractiveness


    A study published in the journal <em>Infant Behavior & Development</em> revealed that the standard "<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCQQtwIwAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch?v%3DXTV8bOv3Jhs&ei=0uLBToKrMuPu0gHkmNH0BA&usg=AFQjCNFtutJJhlTFZJ2fm-cmsDo46XMpzw" target="_hplink">You Must Have Been a Beautiful Baby</a>" has little to do with reality. When 253 college students were asked to rank photos of the same individuals as infants and young adults (without being told who was who), there was <a href="http://bodyodd.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/08/31/7542626-must-have-been-a-beautiful-baby-maybe-not" target="_hplink">no relationship between how cute the students found the babies and how attractive they found the grown-ups</a>.




  • They're Good At Sharing


    No, really, it's true. It doesn't matter how many times you've heard the shout "Mine!" -- research shows babies can sense fairness at 15 months.

    During one study at the <a href="http://www.washington.edu/news/articles/babies-show-sense-of-fairness-altruism-as-early-as-15-months-1" target="_hplink">University of Washington</a>, 47 babies observed videos of an experimenter distributing milk and crackers to two people. When one recipient received more food than the other, the babies paid more attention. That means they had expected a fair distribution.

    The researchers also found that babies who did notice unfairness were more likely to share their own toys.




  • They Read Minds


    OK, so they're not exactly psychic. But a <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/11/111101130204.htm" target="_hplink">recent study</a> from the University of Missouri found that babies just 10 months old are starting to follow the thought processes of others. Yuyan Luo, an associate professor of developmental psychology who conducted the study, tells The Huffington Post, "Babies, like adults, when they see something for the first time -- when something is surprising -- they look for a long time. It shows [they recognize] something is inconsistent."

    It's called the "violation of expectation," she explained. When babies are surprised by something or notice something unexpected has happened, they tend to gaze at that thing longer. In Luo's research, babies watched actors consistently choose object A (such as a block or a cylinder) over object B. When an actor then switched to object B, the babies stared for about five to six seconds longer, meaning they recognized the change in preference.




  • They're A Little Bit Racist


    Don't judge a book by its cover. Treat all people the same. We're all equals. These are sentiments parents strive to teach their kids from a very young age. And they should. Starting, like, immediately. Researchers at the University of Sheffield in the United Kingdom found that babies at three months <a href="http://www.world-science.net/exclusives/060212_racefrm2.htm" target="_hplink">begin showing a preference for the faces of people of their own race</a>.

    But not all hope for equality is lost. The same study showed that babies who are exposed to people of all different races are less likely to develop bias at such an early age.




  • The Rhythm Is Gonna Get Them


    Researchers from Brigham Young University found that five-month-old babies can <a href=" http://news.byu.edu/archive08-oct-babymusic.aspx" target="_hplink">identify an upbeat song as being different from a series of sad, slow songs</a>.

    In other words, they are happy. They know it. They will clap their hands. Or stare longer, as the case may be. The experimenters showed babies an emotionless face while music played. When they played a new sad song, the babies looked away. When the music pepped up, the babies stared for three to four seconds longer.




  • They Can Tell The Good Guy From The Bad Guy


    Babies have a sense of morality at six months old, <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1275574/Babies-know-difference-good-evil-months-study-reveals.html" target="_hplink">say Yale researchers</a>.

    During the Yale study, babies watched a puppet show in which a wooden shape with eyes tried to climb a hill over and over again. Sometimes a second puppet helped him up the hill, and other times a third puppet pushed him down.

    After watching the act several times, the babies were presented with both puppets. They showed a clear preference for the good characters over the bad ones by reaching to play with the good puppet.




  • They Can Read Lips ... Kind Of


    Dr. Janet Werker of the University of British Columbia, who studies how babies perceive language, found that if a mother spoke two languages while pregnant, her infant could <a href="http://www.livescience.com/13016-bilingual-babies-brain-language-learning.html" target="_hplink">recognize the difference</a> between the two.

    And they don't even have to be spoken out loud. Werker's research found that infants four to six months old can <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/11/health/views/11klass.html" target="_hplink">visually discriminate two languages</a> when watching muted videos of someone speaking both.